The documented history of Standing on the Side of Love and the current stated purpose of Side With Love show how inclusive religious values can inform organized, spiritually grounded public action.
Purpose at a Glance
Side With Love describes itself as the organizing strategy team of the Unitarian Universalist Association. Its stated purpose is to help Unitarian Universalists and aligned communities take spiritually grounded, justice-oriented action.
That support takes several forms: organizing, leadership development, political education, and collective action. Together, these practices offer a pathway for people who want to connect inclusive faith commitments with public engagement. The emphasis is not only on affirming values, but also on developing the knowledge, relationships, leadership, and shared capacity needed to act on them.
This purpose provides a useful frame for understanding the work today. It identifies faith as a source of grounding while treating justice as something pursued through organized participation rather than individual conviction alone.
The Values Underlying the Work
A 2009 UU World account placed the Standing on the Side of Love campaign within the Unitarian Universalist principle affirming the inherent worth and dignity of every person. In that historical framing, love was more than a private feeling. It was presented as a public response to violence, exclusion, and oppression.
This understanding joins inclusion with responsibility. Affirming human dignity has consequences for how communities respond when people are threatened, marginalized, or denied full participation. Love, in this context, becomes a reason to resist dehumanization and to stand alongside affected people.
The historical account therefore presents public action as an expression of religious values. It does not suggest that compassion alone resolves injustice. Instead, it connects a moral commitment to human worth with visible solidarity, community cooperation, and organized action.
Origins After the 2008 Knoxville Church Shooting
According to UU World’s 2009 reporting, Standing on the Side of Love was launched after the 2008 shooting at Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville. The account describes the responses of the two affected congregations and the wider Knoxville community as important sources of inspiration for the campaign’s organizers.
The congregations continued to present themselves as open and welcoming in the aftermath of the violence. The report also highlighted the broad support offered by people across Knoxville. Within the campaign’s emerging story, those responses demonstrated how a community could answer violence without abandoning its commitment to inclusion.
That setting shaped the movement’s early public meaning. The campaign connected solidarity after a specific act of violence with a broader effort to oppose exclusion and oppression. Its origins were therefore rooted both in grief and in the collective response that followed.
This is a historical account published close to the campaign’s launch. It supports an explanation of the movement’s reported beginnings, but it should not be treated as evidence about present-day organizational structures, programs, or governance.
How the Early Movement Supported Local Action
The Standing on the Side of Love website launched in 2009 with practical aims for congregations and local participants. UU World reported that it was intended to offer resources for local organizing and community partnerships, distribute national messaging, and encourage participation by sharing stories of action.
These functions addressed several distinct needs. Organizing resources could help communities move from general concern toward coordinated work. Partnership guidance could support relationships beyond an individual congregation. Shared messaging could give geographically dispersed participants a recognizable public language. Stories could show that participation was possible and help people learn from action already underway.
The early model combined a common national identity with locally rooted activity. Rather than describing a single action for every community, the reported aims focused on giving congregations resources they could use in their own settings and alongside community partners.
From an Early Grassroots Movement to Today’s Stated Work
There is a clear continuity in stated purpose between the early campaign and Side With Love’s current official description. The 2009 account presented love as a public answer to violence, exclusion, and oppression. Today, Side With Love says it supports spiritually grounded, justice-oriented action through organizing, leadership development, political education, and collective action.
Both descriptions connect values with participation. The early movement sought to equip congregations for local organizing, community partnership, shared communication, and the exchange of action stories. The current description places similar importance on building people’s ability to understand issues, develop leadership, organize with others, and act collectively.
This comparison concerns the purposes expressed in the available sources. It should not be read as a complete institutional history or as proof that every early structure, program, or relationship continued unchanged. The sources support a connection between the early moral vision and the present emphasis on organized action, but they do not document every organizational development between 2009 and today.
Current Areas of Action
Side With Love currently lists several areas of work: climate justice; decriminalization and immigrant justice; democracy; bodily autonomy; and congregational organizing.
The range reflects an approach that links issue-based engagement with the capacity of communities to organize. Climate, immigration, democracy, and bodily autonomy are identified as substantive justice concerns. Congregational organizing focuses attention on how faith communities develop the relationships, leadership, and shared practices needed to participate.
Listing these areas does not mean that one action will fit every person or community. It establishes the scope of Side With Love’s current stated work and provides starting points for communities considering where their commitments and capacities may connect with collective justice efforts.
Why Communities Need Practical Support
Turning shared values into public action requires more than agreement about principles. The early movement’s stated goals indicate practical needs around local organizing, community partnerships, clear messaging, and communication. Side With Love’s current emphasis on leadership development and political education adds further dimensions: people may need opportunities to learn, lead, and coordinate before they can participate effectively in collective work.
A separate article about congregational mission narratives offers examples of difficulties that communities might encounter, including justice efforts becoming disconnected from core values or mission, a lack of people able to lead, and insufficient resources. These are illustrative scenarios, not findings from representative research, so they should not be generalized to all congregations.
Taken together, the sources show why practical infrastructure matters. Communities may benefit from tools that help them clarify purpose, build internal capacity, communicate responsibly, form partnerships, and choose actions suited to their circumstances. The goal is not to prescribe a universal formula, but to make the passage from conviction to coordinated participation more informed and sustainable.
What the Available Sources Do and Do Not Establish
The available sources establish two limited but important points. UU World’s 2009 reporting documents the movement’s reported origins, values, and early resource goals. Side With Love’s current official description establishes its stated role, methods, and areas of work today.
The sources do not provide a complete organizational history connecting every stage of the early campaign with the current team. They also do not fully establish this site’s independent governance, editorial methods, or precise organizational relationship with Side With Love. Those questions require separate documentation and should not be answered by inference from the historical and current descriptions used here.
Turning Shared Values Into Thoughtful Action
The history described here offers a durable question: how can an inclusive commitment to human dignity become compassionate and informed public action? The early movement answered by encouraging local organizing, partnership, shared communication, and stories of participation. Side With Love’s current positioning emphasizes organizing, leadership development, political education, and collective action.
Readers can explore this site’s practical resources while considering what responsible engagement looks like in their own communities. That may begin with clarifying shared values, learning about an issue, strengthening leadership, or building relationships with community partners. No single action or program is appropriate everywhere. Thoughtful participation depends on context, capacity, and the people most affected, while retaining the central connection between inclusive values and collective responsibility.
Frequently asked questions
What was Standing on the Side of Love founded in response to?
UU World reported in 2009 that the campaign was launched after the 2008 shooting at Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church. The open and welcoming response of the two affected congregations, together with broad support from the Knoxville community, inspired its organizers.
What is Side With Love’s stated purpose today?
Side With Love describes itself as the Unitarian Universalist Association’s organizing strategy team. It says it supports Unitarian Universalists and aligned communities in spiritually grounded, justice-oriented action through organizing, leadership development, political education, and collective action.
What issues does Side With Love currently address?
Its currently listed areas of work are climate justice, decriminalization and immigrant justice, democracy, bodily autonomy, and congregational organizing.
Do these sources establish this site’s governance or its exact relationship with Side With Love?
No. The sources document the early movement’s reported history and Side With Love’s current official positioning, but they do not fully establish this site’s independent governance, editorial methods, or precise organizational relationship with the current Side With Love team.
Disclosures and limitations
– This article was prepared with AI assistance and is based only on the supplied research package, including a 2009 UU World historical account, Side With Love’s current official description, and a separately identified article containing illustrative congregational scenarios. – Historical claims and current organizational claims are distinguished because the available sources do not document every institutional development between the early campaign and the present-day Side With Love team. – The discussion of possible congregational difficulties uses examples from the supplied source; those examples are not presented as representative research or verified user feedback. – No products are recommended, and no affiliate relationship or commercial endorsement is included.
Sources
– Love the Way You Lie – Wikipedia — en.wikipedia.org – Side With Love | Social Justice Organizing & Faith in Action — Side with Love – Standing on the Side of Love — givingspeaks.com – UUA launches ‘Standing on the Side of Love’ campaign — UU World Magazine – An intro to Faith Shared – YouTube — youtube.com – FRONTLINE/WORLD . Stories by Date | PBS — pbs.org – United Arab Emirates: Ninth EU-UAE Structural Dialogue on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Concludes Virtually — EEAS – Books by W. J. May on Google Play — play.google.com – Consistency Builds Credibility and Trust in Leadership | Gregg McPherson posted on the topic | LinkedIn — LinkedIn – Standing in the Shadows of Love – Wikipedia — en.wikipedia.org